SubscribeMore specifically, 11 U.S.C.A ?525(b) provides, “No private employer may terminate the employment of, or discriminate with respect to employment against, an individual who is or has been a debtor under this title, a debtor or bankrupt under the Bankruptcy Act, or an individual associated with such debtor or bankrupt, solely because such debtor or bankrupt”.
There has been several cases directly on-point with the forgoing. In one case, a Police department rule rendering a city policeman subject to dismissal for the filing of a petition in bankruptcy was unconstitutional under U.S.C.A.Const. Art. 6, cl. 2, since the rule, while intended to insure a reliable and respectable police force, had the effect of prohibiting a policeman burdened with staggering debts from obtaining “a new opportunity in life and a clear field for future effort, unhampered by the pressure and discouragement of pre-existing debt”, an effect in direct contravention of the stated purpose of this title. Rutledge v. City of Shreveport, W.D.La.1975, 387 F.Supp. 1277.
Chapter 13 debtor, a former chief appraiser for a county tax appraisal district, was fired from her job in violation of the Bankruptcy Code’s anti discrimination provision where it was apparent from the totality of the circumstances that appraisal district’s board of directors determined that debtor would be discharged because they were embarrassed that she had filed bankruptcy and that it had become public knowledge. In re McKibben, Bkrtcy.E.D.Tex.1999, 233 B.R. 378.
Pursuant to Federal and state law, it is also a violation of law to either refuse or fail to promote or hire an employee based upon their status as a bankruptcy filer. In one case, an employer’s failure to offer participation to debtor in commission advancement program after debtor had filed for bankruptcy, when all other account specialists were offered participation, violated antidiscrimination provision of Bankruptcy Code, where determining reason for failing to offer participation to debtor was fact of his bankruptcy. In re Vaughter, bkrtcy.W.D.Tex.1989, 109 B.R. 229.
The forgoing article was drafted by Goldstein and Clegg, LLC, an Employment and Bankruptcy Law Firm.
Michael_A._Goldstein
Last 10 posts in Bankruptcy
- Getting a Loan After Bankruptcy - Finally a Way to Ease All Your Worries - April 26th, 2009
- IVA Information - Do Away With Your Debt Problems Here! - April 26th, 2009
- Can a Do it Yourself Bankruptcy Ruin Your Chances of Financial Freedom? - February 18th, 2009
- Debt Loans - Wipe Out Your Debt Stress - February 3rd, 2009
- Bike Loans - Loans For Buying a Bike - February 3rd, 2009
- Instant Tenant Loans - Fast and Speedy Finance - February 3rd, 2009
- Unemployed Bad Credit Loans - Unfavorable Criteria Are Accepted - January 31st, 2009
- Loans For People on DSS - People on Benefits Can Get the Financial Benefits With Easy Procedure - January 30th, 2009
- Apply For Government Grant - Reasons Why You Should Apply For Government Loans - January 29th, 2009
- Default Loans - A New Ray of Hope to Make Your Life Better - January 28th, 2009
Related posts
Tags: Bankruptcy, debts, filing bankruptcy, tax
What Say You?